Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
J Med Case Rep ; 17(1): 66, 2023 Feb 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2238657

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Like other viral infections, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection could affect different human body systems, including host immune responses. Three years after its pandemic, we learn more about this novel coronavirus. As we expected, different co-infections with various organisms, such as viruses, bacteria, and even fungi, have been reported. However, concurrent infection with two severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 strains and cytomegalovirus is extremely unusual. We have only a rudimentary understanding of such co-infections and their long-term consequences for patients with cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: An 18-year-old young Iranian adult with acute lymphoblastic leukemia presented with abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting following a recent history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection. The patient never experienced respiratory symptoms, and the chest imaging study was normal on admission. His primary laboratory investigation revealed prerenal azotemia and severe abnormal liver function tests (blood urea nitrogen 32 mg/dL, creatinine 1.75 mg/dL, prothrombin time 66 s, partial thromboplastin time 44.5 s, international normalized ratio 5.14, total bilirubin 2.9 mg/dL, and direct bilirubin 2.59 mg/dL). Cytomegalovirus disease was diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction in his blood and stool samples. The patient's gastrointestinal signs and symptoms improved shortly after receiving intravenous ganciclovir treatment. His gastrointestinal symptoms continued intermittently for weeks despite maintenance valganciclovir prescription, necessitating frequent hospitalizations. The patient was complicated by the recurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms during the sixth hospitalization, even though he had no respiratory symptoms, and the nasopharyngeal test revealed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 Wuhan strain for the first time. Remdesivir and valganciclovir were administrated due to persistent enteritis and evidence of intestinal tissue invasion by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and cytomegalovirus on multiple intestinal biopsies, which led to partial clinical responses. Cytomegalovirus and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 fecal shedding continued for more than 6 months despite repeated antiviral therapy, and the Wuhan and Alpha strains were also detected in his nasopharyngeal samples through repeated sampling (confirmed by four nasopharyngeal sampling and multiple stool specimens and several intestinal biopsies). Finally, during the Delta-variant (B.1.617.2) outbreak in Iran, the patient was admitted again with febrile neutropenia and decreased level of consciousness, necessitating respiratory support and mechanical ventilation. During the Delta-variant peak, the patient's nasopharyngeal sample once more tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The patient died a few days later from cardiopulmonary arrest. CONCLUSION: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has encountered patients with cancer with critical diagnostic and treatment challenges. Patients who are immunocompromised may co-infect with multiple severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 strains and cytomegalovirus, and even with timely diagnosis and treatment, the prognosis may be poor.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Cytomegalovirus Infections , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Male , Humans , Young Adult , Adolescent , SARS-CoV-2 , Cytomegalovirus , Valganciclovir , Iran , Cytomegalovirus Infections/complications , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/complications , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy
4.
J Nanobiotechnology ; 20(1): 335, 2022 Jul 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1935529

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunodeficiency individuals, including transplant recipients and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome patients. Antiviral drugs ganciclovir (GCV) and phosphonoformate (PFA) are first-line agents for pneumonia caused by herpesvirus infection. However, the therapy suffers from various limitations such as low efficiency, drug resistance, toxicity, and lack of specificity. METHODS: The antiviral drugs GCV and PFA were loaded into the pH-responsive nanoparticles fabricated by poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) and 1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium-propane (DOTAP), and further coated with cell membranes derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to form artificial stem cells, namely MPDGP. We evaluated the viral suppression effects of MPDGP in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: MPDGP showed significant inflammation tropism and efficient suppression of viral replication and virus infection-associated inflammation in the CMV-induced pneumonia model. The synergistic effects of the combination of viral DNA elongation inhibitor GCV and viral DNA polymerase inhibitor PFA on suppressing the inflammation efficiently. CONCLUSION: The present study develops a novel therapeutic intervention using artificial stem cells to deliver antiviral drugs at inflammatory sites, which shows great potential for the targeted treatment of pneumonia. To our best knowledge, we are the first to fabricate this kind of artificial stem cell to deliver antiviral drugs for pneumonia treatment.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents , Nanoparticle Drug Delivery System , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cytomegalovirus , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated/chemistry , Foscarnet/pharmacology , Foscarnet/therapeutic use , Ganciclovir/pharmacology , Ganciclovir/therapeutic use , Humans , Inflammation/drug therapy , Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer/chemistry , Quaternary Ammonium Compounds/chemistry , Stem Cells
5.
Transpl Int ; 35: 10332, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1933951

ABSTRACT

Infections are leading causes of morbidity/mortality following solid organ transplantation (SOT) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) is among the most frequent pathogens, causing a considerable threat to SOT recipients. A survey was conducted 19 July-31 October 2019 to capture clinical practices about CMV in SOT recipients (e.g., how practices aligned with guidelines, how adequately treatments met patients' needs, and respondents' expectations for future developments). Transplant professionals completed a ∼30-minute online questionnaire: 224 responses were included, representing 160 hospitals and 197 SOT programs (41 countries; 167[83%] European programs). Findings revealed a heterogenous approach to CMV diagnosis and management and, sometimes, significant divergence from international guidelines. Valganciclovir prophylaxis (of variable duration) was administered by 201/224 (90%) respondents in D+/R- SOT and by 40% in R+ cases, with pre-emptive strategies generally reserved for R+ cases: DNA thresholds to initiate treatment ranged across 10-10,000 copies/ml. Ganciclovir-resistant CMV strains were still perceived as major challenges, and tailored treatment was one of the most important unmet needs for CMV management. These findings may help to design studies to evaluate safety and efficacy of new strategies to prevent CMV disease in SOT recipients, and target specific educational activities to harmonize CMV management in this challenging population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cytomegalovirus Infections , Organ Transplantation , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cytomegalovirus , Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Cytomegalovirus Infections/prevention & control , Ganciclovir/therapeutic use , Humans , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Surveys and Questionnaires , Transplant Recipients
6.
Front Immunol ; 12: 784145, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1674332

ABSTRACT

As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is ongoing and new variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are emerging, there is an urgent need for vaccines to protect individuals at high risk for complications and to potentially control disease outbreaks by herd immunity. Surveillance of rare safety issues related to these vaccines is progressing, since more granular data emerge about adverse events of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines during post-marketing surveillance. Varicella zoster virus (VZV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation has already been reported in COVID-19 patients. In addition, adverse events after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination have also been in the context of varicella zoster virus (VZV) reactivation and directly associated with the mRNA vaccine. We present the first case of CMV reactivation and pericarditis in temporal association with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, particularly adenovirus-based DNA vector vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 against SARS-CoV-2. After initiation of antiviral therapy with oral valganciclovir, CMV viremia disappeared and clinical symptoms rapidly improved. Since huge vaccination programs are ongoing worldwide, post-marketing surveillance systems must be in place to assess vaccine safety that is important for the detection of any events. In the context of the hundreds of millions of individuals to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, a potential causal association with CMV reactivation may result in a considerable number of cases with potentially severe complications.


Subject(s)
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/adverse effects , Cytomegalovirus/drug effects , Pericarditis/chemically induced , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Virus Activation/drug effects , Aged , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cytomegalovirus/physiology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/chemically induced , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Cytomegalovirus Infections/virology , Female , Humans , Pericarditis/drug therapy , Pericarditis/virology , Treatment Outcome , Valganciclovir/therapeutic use , Viremia/chemically induced , Viremia/drug therapy , Viremia/virology
7.
Pharmacol Ther ; 235: 108121, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1665376

ABSTRACT

Favipiravir, a broad-spectrum RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitor, inhibits the replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) at significantly lower concentrations than the plasma trough levels achieved by the dosage adopted for influenza treatment and exhibits efficacy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. Although high doses of favipiravir are required due to the molecule being a purine analog, its conversion into the active form in infected cells with active viral RNA synthesis enhances the antiviral specificity and selectivity as a chain terminator with lethal mutagenesis. Another characteristic feature is the lack of generation of favipiravir-resistant virus. COVID-19 pneumonia is caused by strong cell-mediated immunity against virus-infected cells, and the inflammatory response induced by adaptive immunity continues to peak for 3 to 5 days despite antiviral treatment. This has also been observed in herpes zoster (HZ) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonia. Inflammation due to an immune response may mask the effectiveness of favipiravir against COVID-19 pneumonia. Favipiravir significantly shortened the recovery time in patients with mild COVID-19 pneumonia by 3 days with the start of treatment by the 5th day of symptom onset. Since both CMV and COVID-19 pneumonia are caused by adaptive immunity and prevention of cytomegalovirus pneumonia is the standard treatment due to difficulties in treating refractory CMV pneumonia, COVID-19 pneumonia should be prevented with early treatment as well. In the present study, we have comprehensively reviewed the optimal antiviral therapy for COVID-19 based on clinical trials of favipiravir for the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia and the concurrently established therapies for other viral infections, particularly HZ and CMV pneumonia. Optimally, antivirals should be administered immediately after COVID-19 diagnosis, similar to that after influenza diagnosis, to prevent COVID-19 pneumonia and complications resulting from microangiopathy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Cytomegalovirus Infections , Influenza, Human , Amides/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Testing , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Pyrazines , SARS-CoV-2
8.
J Med Case Rep ; 16(1): 58, 2022 Jan 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1662424

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The effect of coronavirus disease 2019 on the immune system is increasingly recognized. When severe, it causes immune dysregulation that may favor other infections, including Herpesviridae. Cytomegalovirus shares many innate immune pathways with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, which may potentiate each other. We describe a case of cytomegalovirus pneumonitis complicating the course of coronavirus disease 2019 in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus/systemic sclerosis overlap and usual interstitial pneumonia, mimicking interstitial lung disease exacerbation. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first case to be reported worldwide in the setting of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease. CASE DESCRIPTION: We describe the case of a 47-year-old white/Yemeni female who is known to have systemic lupus erythematosus/scleroderma overlap and usual interstitial pneumonia who was initially admitted with severe coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia mandating intensive care. After initial improvement, it was later complicated with cytomegalovirus pneumonitis, mimicking interstitial lung disease exacerbation. The case was successfully treated with ganciclovir. CONCLUSION: Intriguingly, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and cytomegalovirus may potentiate each other, since they share some innate immune pathways. Subjects with severe coronavirus disease 2019 and underlying connective tissue diseases and those who are immunosuppressed carry higher risk compared with other cohorts, which may mandate active surveillance for cytomegalovirus coinfection or reactivation. Among various immunosuppressive therapies that has been tried for cytokine storm, use of anti-interleukin-6 inhibitors in the aforementioned population may carry more harm than previously thought, which may suggest that is reasonable to omit its use in treating this group with coronavirus disease 2019. This case underlines an underrecognized and underreported cause of morbidity and mortality during the course of severe coronavirus disease 2019 and will help to alert clinicians of its occurrence.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cytomegalovirus Infections , Pneumonia , Cytomegalovirus , Cytomegalovirus Infections/complications , Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2
9.
J Intensive Care Med ; 37(9): 1152-1158, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1523198

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reactivation of viruses such as Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) are common in critically ill patients and have been described in patients with severe COVID-19. However, it is unclear whether these reactivations are associated with increased mortality and whether targeted treatments are beneficial. METHODS: In a retrospective single-center cohort study, patients with severe COVID-19 treated on our intensive care unit (ICU) were screened for EBV and CMV reactivation as detected by polymerase chain reaction. If present, patient characteristics, temporal connections to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 diagnosis and corticosteroid use, the use of targeted treatments as well as the course of disease and outcome were analyzed. As control group, non-COVID-19 patients with sepsis, treated within the same time period on our ICU, served as control group to compare incidences of viral reactivation. RESULTS: In 19 (16%) of 117 patients with severe COVID-19 treated on our ICU EBV reactivations were identified, comparable 18 (14%) of 126 in the non-COVID-19 control group (P = .672). Similarly, in 11 (9%) of 117 patients CMV reactivations were identified, comparable to the 16 (13%) of 126 in the non-COVID-19 sepsis patients (P = .296). The majority of EBV (58%) and CMV reactivations (55%) were detected in patients under systemic corticosteroid treatment. 7 (37%) of 19 patients with EBV reactivation survived the ICU stay, 2 (29%) of 7 patients with rituximab treatment and 5 (42%) of 12 patients without treatment (P = .568). Five (50%) of 10 patients with CMV reactivation survived the ICU stay, 5 (83%) of 6 patients with ganciclovir treatment and 0 of 4 patients without treatment (P = .048). Follow-up analysis in these patients showed that the initiation of treatment lead to decrease in viral load. CONCLUSION: Critically ill patients with COVID-19 are at a high risk for EBV and CMV reactivations. Whether these reactivations are a cause of hyperinflammation and require targeted treatment remains uncertain. However, in patients with clinical deterioration or signs of hyperinflammation targeted treatment might be beneficial and warrants further studying.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cytomegalovirus Infections , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections , Sepsis , COVID-19/complications , Cohort Studies , Critical Illness , Cytomegalovirus/physiology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/complications , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/complications , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/diagnosis , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/drug therapy , Herpesvirus 4, Human/physiology , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/complications , Virus Activation/physiology
10.
J Med Virol ; 94(3): 1067-1073, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1487499

ABSTRACT

Systemic corticosteroid therapy is frequently used to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, its maximum duration without secondary infections remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the utility of monitoring cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in patients with COVID-19 and estimate the maximum duration of systemic corticosteroid therapy without secondary infections. We included 59 patients with severe COVID-19 without CMV infection on admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). All patients received systemic corticosteroid therapy under invasive mechanical ventilation, with examination for plasma CMV-deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) levels during the ICU stay. We analyzed the correlations among patient characteristics, CMV infection, diseases, and patient mortality. CMV infections were newly identified in 15 (25.4%) patients; moreover, anti-CMV treatment was administered to six (10.2%) patients during the ICU stay. Four (6.8%) patients had secondary infection-related mortality. The cumulative incidences of CMV infection and anti-CMV treatment during the ICU stay were 26.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.8%-39.0%) and 12.3% (95% CI, 4.8%-23.4%), respectively. Furthermore, the median duration of systemic corticosteroid therapy without CMV infection was 15 days (95% CI, 13-16 days). The presence of CMV infection was associated with mortality during the ICU stay (p = 0.003). Monitoring plasma CMV-DNA levels could facilitate the detection of secondary CMV infection due to prolonged systemic corticosteroid therapy. The duration of systemic corticosteroid therapy for COVID-19 should be limited.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Coinfection , Cytomegalovirus Infections , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Cytomegalovirus Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Intensive Care Units
11.
Clin Exp Med ; 22(3): 327-346, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1368499

ABSTRACT

Treatment of the novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains a complicated challenge, especially among patients with severe disease. In recent studies, immunosuppressive therapy has shown promising results for control of the cytokine storm syndrome (CSS) in severe cases of COVID-19. However, it is well documented that immunosuppressive agents (e.g., corticosteroids and cytokine blockers) increase the risk of opportunistic infections. On the other hand, several opportunistic infections were reported in COVID-19 patients, including Aspergillus spp., Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans, Pneumocystis jiroveci (carinii), mucormycosis, Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Herpes simplex virus (HSV), Strongyloides stercoralis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Toxoplasma gondii. This review is a snapshot about the main opportunistic infections that reported among COVID-19 patients. As such, we summarized information about the main immunosuppressive agents that were used in recent clinical trials for COVID-19 patients and the risk of opportunistic infections following these treatments. We also discussed about the main challenges regarding diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19-associated opportunistic infections (CAOIs).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Candidiasis , Cytomegalovirus Infections , Opportunistic Infections , Pneumonia, Pneumocystis , COVID-19/complications , Candidiasis/complications , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Opportunistic Infections/complications , Opportunistic Infections/drug therapy , Opportunistic Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Pneumocystis/etiology
12.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 58(4): 106409, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1330851

ABSTRACT

Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been concern about the concomitant rise of antimicrobial resistance. While bacterial co-infections seem rare in COVID-19 patients admitted to hospital wards and intensive care units (ICUs), an increase in empirical antibiotic use has been described. In the ICU setting, where antibiotics are already abundantly-and often inappropriately-prescribed, the need for an ICU-specific antimicrobial stewardship programme is widely advocated. Apart from essentially warning against the use of antibacterial drugs for the treatment of a viral infection, other aspects of ICU antimicrobial stewardship need to be considered in view of the clinical course and characteristics of COVID-19. First, the distinction between infectious and non-infectious (inflammatory) causes of respiratory deterioration during an ICU stay is difficult, and the much-debated relevance of fungal and viral co-infections adds to the complexity of empirical antimicrobial prescribing. Biomarkers such as procalcitonin for the decision to start antibacterial therapy for ICU nosocomial infections seem to be more promising in COVID-19 than non-COVID-19 patients. In COVID-19 patients, cytomegalovirus reactivation is an important factor to consider when assessing patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 as it may have a role in modulating the patient immune response. The diagnosis of COVID-19-associated invasive aspergillosis is challenging because of the lack of sensitivity and specificity of the available tests. Furthermore, altered pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties need to be taken into account when prescribing antimicrobial therapy. Future research should now further explore the 'known unknowns', ideally with robust prospective study designs.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antimicrobial Stewardship/methods , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antimicrobial Stewardship/organization & administration , Biomarkers/analysis , Coinfection/drug therapy , Coinfection/microbiology , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Cytomegalovirus Infections/virology , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis/diagnosis , Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis/drug therapy , Virus Activation/drug effects
13.
Transpl Immunol ; 68: 101435, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1294281

ABSTRACT

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a rare complication after liver transplantation that characterized by high mortality. We presented a case of aGVHD after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The patient suffered from fever, oral ulcer, rashes and diarrhea and had a co-infection with Cytomegalovirus (CMV). Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis for cluster of differentiation (CD3) cells and skin biopsy indicated aGVHD. His regimens included high dose of steroids, ruxolitinib, basiliximab, local liver radiotherapy and antibiotics prophylaxis, with the withdrawal of tacrolimus and MMF. Unfortunately, he developed an acute rejection followed by cytomegalovirus infection and lung infection. Soon afterwards he was sent to "isolation ward" due to high suspicion for clinical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Fortunately, He was excluded from COVID-19 after nucleic acid and antibody tests. Though closely contact with other COVID-19 patients for a month, the patient was not affected with COVID-19 through his careful protective measures. Finally, the patient recovered after antiviral and antifungal treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of a patient recovered from aGVHD as a close contact.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/administration & dosage , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , COVID-19/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Cytomegalovirus Infections , Cytomegalovirus , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Liver Transplantation , SARS-CoV-2 , Acute Disease , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Graft vs Host Disease/diagnosis , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/virology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
14.
Viruses ; 13(7)2021 06 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1289029

ABSTRACT

In stark contrast to the rapid development of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), an effective human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine is still lacking. Furthermore, despite virologic suppression and CD4 T-cell count normalization with antiretroviral therapy (ART), people living with HIV (PLWH) still exhibit increased morbidity and mortality compared to the general population. Such differences in health outcomes are related to higher risk behaviors, but also to HIV-related immune activation and viral coinfections. Among these coinfections, cytomegalovirus (CMV) latent infection is a well-known inducer of long-term immune dysregulation. Cytomegalovirus contributes to the persistent immune activation in PLWH receiving ART by directly skewing immune response toward itself, and by increasing immune activation through modification of the gut microbiota and microbial translocation. In addition, through induction of immunosenescence, CMV has been associated with a decreased response to infections and vaccines. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the influence of CMV on the immune system, the mechanisms underlying a reduced response to vaccines, and discuss new therapeutic advances targeting CMV that could be used to improve vaccine response in PLWH.


Subject(s)
Coinfection/virology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/virology , Cytomegalovirus/immunology , HIV Infections/virology , Vaccines/immunology , Animals , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials as Topic , Cytomegalovirus/pathogenicity , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Cytomegalovirus Infections/immunology , Gastrointestinal Tract/immunology , Gastrointestinal Tract/pathology , Gastrointestinal Tract/virology , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/immunology , Humans , Immunosenescence , Inflammation , Latent Infection/immunology , Latent Infection/virology , Mice , Vaccines/administration & dosage
15.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 22(1): 88-94, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1151533

ABSTRACT

Background: Viral infections after burns are less common than bacterial infections but usually occur in the more severely burned patients and have been associated with poor outcomes. Methods: Retrospective reviews and case series were examined to provide an overview of the management of viral infections in the burn patient. Results: The most common viral pathogens in these patients are the herpesviruses, which include herpes simplex, varicella zoster, cytomegalovirus, and human herpesvirus 6. Established viral infections that may complicate patient management include human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B and C, and, more recently, the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Herpesvirus infections can occur as primary or nosocomial pathogens but clinical manifestations most commonly are re-activation of latent viral infection. Because of the paucity of data in the burn population, much of the evidence for specific treatments is extrapolated from patients with severe immunosuppression or critical illness. Antiviral therapy is employed for the burn patient with herpesvirus infections. This is an area of active study, and further research is needed to better understand the risks, clinical manifestations, and attributable morbidity and mortality of viral infections. Conclusions: Major burn injury results in immunosuppression and viral infection in a small number of patients. Recognition and antiviral therapy are employed, but additional studies are necessary to improve outcomes in these patients.


Subject(s)
Burns/epidemiology , Burns/immunology , Virus Diseases/epidemiology , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Burns/drug therapy , Burns/virology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Cytomegalovirus Infections/epidemiology , Herpesviridae Infections/diagnostic imaging , Herpesviridae Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Immunocompromised Host/immunology , Inflammation Mediators/metabolism , Retrospective Studies , Roseolovirus Infections/drug therapy , Roseolovirus Infections/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Virus Diseases/drug therapy , Virus Diseases/mortality
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL